33 Kbps News
Stream
Posts
The Modern Environmental Movement Is A Battle For Political Power And Corporate Money
Hey buddy, what's your carbon footprint? If you are part of the search party for the M.I.A. Malaysian Boeing 777 it is huge. With 25 countries taking part in the search (so far) the total cost of time, fuel, and manpower may be eventually measured in the 100's of millions (to be conservative). As for the carbon footprint? You wont hear a word about it.
Imagine a military exercise slated to take 100's of ships/vessels without a firm completion date. Now imagine the uproar and calculations that would be made to determine the 'environmental damage'... Huge! Right?
Do we really need to look for the lost 777? We feel obligated, but lets please be honest, we know that it went down and that the primary correction needed is for a permanent transponder to be installed to all commercial aircraft so that we can track future suicide missions. Aside from that, the wreckage (if there is any) will eventually be spotted by passing ships on their normal routes.
So where is the outrage over the wasted tonnage of carbon into the atmosphere. Isn't this carbon just as damaging as that produced by your SUV, dog, or hamburger?
It's a prime example that the environmental advocates of today's world carefully pick their fights (not on the merits of saving soil, air, or water); instead with a firm basis on political and monetary gain rooted deeply in public opinion. As for the environment, it will probably survive the terrible toll of humans searching for loved ones.
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Friday, November 2, 2012
The Case To Fire Barack Obama
By His Own Standard, Obama Came Up Short
NOV.02.2012 (The Plastico) - The final data is in for 2008-2012 and while several metrics can be used to measure a President, the challenges of this moment have not been met with decisive executive leadership. Obama was elected into a precarious situation; multiple wars, an economy searching for a bottom, staggering budget deficits, and a darkening sky over every federal entitlement program.
In short, the response has been uneven, unclear, and the basis for four additional years untenable.
We reviewed crucial data points on the economy and on the key issue of jobs. We conclude that the past 4 years have been an unmitigated disaster with the labor participation rate now tumbling to a 30 year low.
Romney has been accused of soliciting a war on women but Romney hasn't managed a workforce disaster for women. On the last day of 2008 forty-seven million women had jobs. Today, two million fewer women have jobs. Those that do are making almost 10% less then they did the day Obama took office.
In January of 2008 Women had an average salary of $47,418.00. Today, 4 years later, a period mostly of 'recovery' since the conclusion of the recession in June of 2009 women now earn an average of $45,362. Hang on, its worse than it sounds because that $2,000 or so in reduced pay calculated with basic inflation puts the true loss of income at approximately $4,000 for every working women during Obama's term.
How about minorities? The data is worse, as is total employment and the total pain of higher so called 'bread basket' costs. Want more - read all you want from the: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Who else is worse off? The NY Times just reported that we now have a record number of people in jail, we all know that we have a record number people on food-stamps, and an alarming number of people being transferred to permanent disability - also a new record.
In fact, this one had to be checked a few times - nearly 6 million people have gone on federal disability under Obama - a historic new record during a period where workplace safety has never been more carefully observed. So how are all of these people getting hurt? Economic pain maybe?
You might remember that Obama said a few months ago that "The private sector is doing fine". Many said that the comment was an accidental 'gaffe' and we were directed Obama's quick apology to 'set it straight'. But that rhetoric was a telling indication of just how Obama sees the private sector and its by looking narrowly at the Fortune 500 while ignoring the huge share of struggling small business' that he argued "Didn't build that".
The evidence is clear when reading the full context. Obama stated that he thinks increased deficit spending through the hiring of government workers is the fix-
So who exactly is better off (in addition to Federal workers)?
Big corporations have had a heyday under the Obama administration and have reeled in record profits during three endless rounds of Quantitative Easing. Obama' team has generally kept in place the Greenspan/Bernanke/W. Bush policy of easy money. In fact, he's put that policy on steroids.
It's been a breathtaking long term party of low interest allowing banks to lend (mostly to well capitalized large corporations). A policy that former Clinton Secretary of Labor Robert Reich points out "won’t help the economy, but will simply fuel a new round of mergers and acquisitions". One example, George Lucas selling out to Disney just in time to beat Obama's tax hikes scheduled for January 1st. We saw M&A records crushed in 2011 with no end in site. These policies are good for the stock market but terrible for employment and jobs says Reich, who notes that the first step of a buyout is to fire all the redundant positions between the two companies.
While most voters have no clue what quantitative easing means, seniors and retirees have been stuck with the brunt of the pain. For example, check on the current rates for a savings account or a certificate of deposit (the places that seniors keep retirement savings) and you will see the worst rate of return...ever. On this point Romney has a clear plan that will help seniors first and foremost - allow a zero tax on dividends and interest for those making less than $250,000. For seniors on fixed incomes- this would be a welcome relief to the past decade.
A primary reason that the Obama administration wants a 2nd term is because they say that Mitt (and folks like him) simply pay way too little in taxes. Obama promised to raise taxes on 'the rich' during his 08' campaign but when given the chance every day for two years he didn't. His reason - the economy was too fragile at the time.
Now with GDP slower than it was in 2011 or 2010; Obama says its the right time to raise taxes. Make sense? It shouldn't. Americans are about to get the second half of Obama economic policy. First came the spending that doubled the deficit and now comes the fiscal cliff of tax hikes and emergency cuts?
But since many of Obama's adds are personal attacks on Romney lets take a quick look at Obama's repeated claims that folks like Mitt pay less than the hard working middle class. The facts tell a different story. Here is a breakdown of income earners and what their effective rates are via Politifact-
Bottom fifth of earners: -12.3 percent (they pay no taxes, receive checks)
Second-to-bottom fifth : -4.2 percent (they pay no taxes, receive checks)
Middle fifth : 4.1 percent
Second-highest fifth : 8.2 percent
Highest fifth : 17.3 percent
The point missed completely is that anyone who collects their income via dividends (like Romney) is paying a double tax on income already taxed at the corporate level. The current 35% rate, the highest in the industrialized world, has already been handed over to the feds no matter if the corporation is owned by one person or one thousand people. Dividends are a result of that already taxed money being distributed to the owners of the company. Regarding Romney's 14.3% tax rate; try 44.3% for the IRS take. This of course all before state, local, and every other excise is calculated in.
Is there another way? Yes, the Romney-Ryan plan is a growth plan to add new taxpayers while freeing up U.S. corporate capital. The focus is on energy.
Turning back the Keystone Pipeline was indeed an unforgivable act by Mr. Obama that cost thousands of jobs. More importantly, it gave us a look into the Obama administrations criteria for energy: If the environmental lobbyists want it, do it - if they don't, then we will stop it. Romney certainly wont employ an energy secretary that is indifferent to gas prices, and he wont play a shell game with coal, gas, and crude oil drilling permits just so we can continue to ship money overseas in trade for tankers full of crude oil.
Obama says he wants manufacturing jobs and one thing will get us there -more cheap natural gas for energy. Just ask CNN's Fareed Zakaria who recently explained that more savings on energy makes America's factories competitive again.
The real question for American's is simple. Can Obama's do in a 2nd term what he couldn't do in his first? What is he planning to do differently?
Bush's huge emergency asset relief plan or 'Tarp' was outdone by the Obama stimulus package. While Tarp has reportedly turned a profit for the treasury, the stimulus package has a well deserved reputation of waste, earmarks, and nontraditional investments into the pockets of private companies that were friendly to Obama's thinking. As Romney says correctly, the government should not be picking winners or losers.
In doing so, the problems are profound; just look at one example that has been uncovered recently at LG Chemical where workers sit and play cards because there is nothing to do. Why haven't they been laid off? Because you the taxpayer are paying their paycheck whether they work or not; sadly they are not. The Chevy Volt they produce batteries for are essentially being made on the promise that unborn American children will repay unborn Chinese children (someday) for the loss of each vehicle produced.
Finally the issue that could decide Ohio and therefore the election: the infamous 'auto bailout'. By now, every voter knows that Ohio will likely be the linchpin for the election. The Obama camp is doubling down on one grossly misleading accusation: 'Mitt wanted Detroit (and apparently Ohio) to go bankrupt and we saved the day'.
One might be tempted to agree with Obama after seeing thousands of ads and a complicit media describe the auto bailout. But see if you can guess which candidate advocated for slashing exec pay and perks, letting stockholders take the hit to save the company, guaranteeing government support, demanding fuel savings, and advocating for the structural changes needed "To save Detroit for the long term..."
Only a left wing radical like Mitt Romney would make those suggestions in 2008- maybe folks should actually just read Romney's article that Obama is betting his re-election on: 'Let Detroit Go Bankrupt'.
After all, Detroit did go bankrupt; Chrysler was sold to the Italian company Fiat and Obama made sure that GM bondholders took it in the shorts while giving his supporters (the UAW) a better deal. The rest of the deal that apparently saved America's heartland involved massive dealership closures across the country plus the sacrifice of Non-Union companies like Delphi. It's not Obama's fault that the Big 3 was in trouble, however, it was in large part the UAW's fault.
We didn't hear about other manufacturers like Honda, Toyota, and Nissan going bankrupt - those companies all have auto plants in America. Why? Those workers didn't cost near what the UAW was able to get from the big 3 after decades of collective bargaining and strikes. The big 3 was no longer viable and Romney's bankruptcy plan would have given GM and Chrysler the flexibility to re-organize with government backing without the full $14B in losses that taxpayers suffered.
All of this aside Obama gave us his standard on fixing the economy, “If I don’t have this done in three years, then this is going to be a one‑term proposition.”. More recently, he gave himself an incomplete on fixing the economy. On November 6th, It's time to fire Barack Obama; and this case was made without one mention of Benghazi, credit ratings, turning back the oceans, Joe Biden, Solyndra, Guantanamo, Immigration reform, or the 100's of other broken campaign promises that Obama never even attempted to employ.
The Plastico.Nov.02.2012
NOV.02.2012 (The Plastico) - The final data is in for 2008-2012 and while several metrics can be used to measure a President, the challenges of this moment have not been met with decisive executive leadership. Obama was elected into a precarious situation; multiple wars, an economy searching for a bottom, staggering budget deficits, and a darkening sky over every federal entitlement program.
In short, the response has been uneven, unclear, and the basis for four additional years untenable.We reviewed crucial data points on the economy and on the key issue of jobs. We conclude that the past 4 years have been an unmitigated disaster with the labor participation rate now tumbling to a 30 year low.
Romney has been accused of soliciting a war on women but Romney hasn't managed a workforce disaster for women. On the last day of 2008 forty-seven million women had jobs. Today, two million fewer women have jobs. Those that do are making almost 10% less then they did the day Obama took office.
In January of 2008 Women had an average salary of $47,418.00. Today, 4 years later, a period mostly of 'recovery' since the conclusion of the recession in June of 2009 women now earn an average of $45,362. Hang on, its worse than it sounds because that $2,000 or so in reduced pay calculated with basic inflation puts the true loss of income at approximately $4,000 for every working women during Obama's term.
How about minorities? The data is worse, as is total employment and the total pain of higher so called 'bread basket' costs. Want more - read all you want from the: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Who else is worse off? The NY Times just reported that we now have a record number of people in jail, we all know that we have a record number people on food-stamps, and an alarming number of people being transferred to permanent disability - also a new record.
In fact, this one had to be checked a few times - nearly 6 million people have gone on federal disability under Obama - a historic new record during a period where workplace safety has never been more carefully observed. So how are all of these people getting hurt? Economic pain maybe?
 | |
| American's have always opposed Obamacare, a law that never received a Republican vote |
You might remember that Obama said a few months ago that "The private sector is doing fine". Many said that the comment was an accidental 'gaffe' and we were directed Obama's quick apology to 'set it straight'. But that rhetoric was a telling indication of just how Obama sees the private sector and its by looking narrowly at the Fortune 500 while ignoring the huge share of struggling small business' that he argued "Didn't build that".
The evidence is clear when reading the full context. Obama stated that he thinks increased deficit spending through the hiring of government workers is the fix-
"The private sector is doing fine. Where we're seeing weaknesses in our economy have to do with state and local government. Oftentimes cuts initiated by, you know, Governors or mayors who are not getting the kind of help that they have in the past from the federal government and who don't have the same kind of flexibility as the federal government in dealing with fewer revenues coming in. And so, you know, if Republicans want to be helpful, if they really want to move forward and put people back to work, what they should be thinking about is how do we help state and local governments"Obama may want to show less concern for government employees whose federal salaries are somehow 37% higher than the pay per hour of the rest of Americans who are digging deeper and deeper to pay out those salaries.
So who exactly is better off (in addition to Federal workers)?
Big corporations have had a heyday under the Obama administration and have reeled in record profits during three endless rounds of Quantitative Easing. Obama' team has generally kept in place the Greenspan/Bernanke/W. Bush policy of easy money. In fact, he's put that policy on steroids.
It's been a breathtaking long term party of low interest allowing banks to lend (mostly to well capitalized large corporations). A policy that former Clinton Secretary of Labor Robert Reich points out "won’t help the economy, but will simply fuel a new round of mergers and acquisitions". One example, George Lucas selling out to Disney just in time to beat Obama's tax hikes scheduled for January 1st. We saw M&A records crushed in 2011 with no end in site. These policies are good for the stock market but terrible for employment and jobs says Reich, who notes that the first step of a buyout is to fire all the redundant positions between the two companies.
While most voters have no clue what quantitative easing means, seniors and retirees have been stuck with the brunt of the pain. For example, check on the current rates for a savings account or a certificate of deposit (the places that seniors keep retirement savings) and you will see the worst rate of return...ever. On this point Romney has a clear plan that will help seniors first and foremost - allow a zero tax on dividends and interest for those making less than $250,000. For seniors on fixed incomes- this would be a welcome relief to the past decade.
 |
| The Ryan plan tracks close to the Simpson-Bowles Plan that the President commissioned but refused to enact |
A primary reason that the Obama administration wants a 2nd term is because they say that Mitt (and folks like him) simply pay way too little in taxes. Obama promised to raise taxes on 'the rich' during his 08' campaign but when given the chance every day for two years he didn't. His reason - the economy was too fragile at the time.
Now with GDP slower than it was in 2011 or 2010; Obama says its the right time to raise taxes. Make sense? It shouldn't. Americans are about to get the second half of Obama economic policy. First came the spending that doubled the deficit and now comes the fiscal cliff of tax hikes and emergency cuts?
But since many of Obama's adds are personal attacks on Romney lets take a quick look at Obama's repeated claims that folks like Mitt pay less than the hard working middle class. The facts tell a different story. Here is a breakdown of income earners and what their effective rates are via Politifact-
Bottom fifth of earners: -12.3 percent (they pay no taxes, receive checks)
Second-to-bottom fifth : -4.2 percent (they pay no taxes, receive checks)
Middle fifth : 4.1 percent
Second-highest fifth : 8.2 percent
Highest fifth : 17.3 percent
The point missed completely is that anyone who collects their income via dividends (like Romney) is paying a double tax on income already taxed at the corporate level. The current 35% rate, the highest in the industrialized world, has already been handed over to the feds no matter if the corporation is owned by one person or one thousand people. Dividends are a result of that already taxed money being distributed to the owners of the company. Regarding Romney's 14.3% tax rate; try 44.3% for the IRS take. This of course all before state, local, and every other excise is calculated in.
Is there another way? Yes, the Romney-Ryan plan is a growth plan to add new taxpayers while freeing up U.S. corporate capital. The focus is on energy.
Turning back the Keystone Pipeline was indeed an unforgivable act by Mr. Obama that cost thousands of jobs. More importantly, it gave us a look into the Obama administrations criteria for energy: If the environmental lobbyists want it, do it - if they don't, then we will stop it. Romney certainly wont employ an energy secretary that is indifferent to gas prices, and he wont play a shell game with coal, gas, and crude oil drilling permits just so we can continue to ship money overseas in trade for tankers full of crude oil.
Obama says he wants manufacturing jobs and one thing will get us there -more cheap natural gas for energy. Just ask CNN's Fareed Zakaria who recently explained that more savings on energy makes America's factories competitive again.
The real question for American's is simple. Can Obama's do in a 2nd term what he couldn't do in his first? What is he planning to do differently?
Bush's huge emergency asset relief plan or 'Tarp' was outdone by the Obama stimulus package. While Tarp has reportedly turned a profit for the treasury, the stimulus package has a well deserved reputation of waste, earmarks, and nontraditional investments into the pockets of private companies that were friendly to Obama's thinking. As Romney says correctly, the government should not be picking winners or losers.
In doing so, the problems are profound; just look at one example that has been uncovered recently at LG Chemical where workers sit and play cards because there is nothing to do. Why haven't they been laid off? Because you the taxpayer are paying their paycheck whether they work or not; sadly they are not. The Chevy Volt they produce batteries for are essentially being made on the promise that unborn American children will repay unborn Chinese children (someday) for the loss of each vehicle produced.
Finally the issue that could decide Ohio and therefore the election: the infamous 'auto bailout'. By now, every voter knows that Ohio will likely be the linchpin for the election. The Obama camp is doubling down on one grossly misleading accusation: 'Mitt wanted Detroit (and apparently Ohio) to go bankrupt and we saved the day'.
One might be tempted to agree with Obama after seeing thousands of ads and a complicit media describe the auto bailout. But see if you can guess which candidate advocated for slashing exec pay and perks, letting stockholders take the hit to save the company, guaranteeing government support, demanding fuel savings, and advocating for the structural changes needed "To save Detroit for the long term..."
Only a left wing radical like Mitt Romney would make those suggestions in 2008- maybe folks should actually just read Romney's article that Obama is betting his re-election on: 'Let Detroit Go Bankrupt'.
After all, Detroit did go bankrupt; Chrysler was sold to the Italian company Fiat and Obama made sure that GM bondholders took it in the shorts while giving his supporters (the UAW) a better deal. The rest of the deal that apparently saved America's heartland involved massive dealership closures across the country plus the sacrifice of Non-Union companies like Delphi. It's not Obama's fault that the Big 3 was in trouble, however, it was in large part the UAW's fault.
We didn't hear about other manufacturers like Honda, Toyota, and Nissan going bankrupt - those companies all have auto plants in America. Why? Those workers didn't cost near what the UAW was able to get from the big 3 after decades of collective bargaining and strikes. The big 3 was no longer viable and Romney's bankruptcy plan would have given GM and Chrysler the flexibility to re-organize with government backing without the full $14B in losses that taxpayers suffered.
All of this aside Obama gave us his standard on fixing the economy, “If I don’t have this done in three years, then this is going to be a one‑term proposition.”. More recently, he gave himself an incomplete on fixing the economy. On November 6th, It's time to fire Barack Obama; and this case was made without one mention of Benghazi, credit ratings, turning back the oceans, Joe Biden, Solyndra, Guantanamo, Immigration reform, or the 100's of other broken campaign promises that Obama never even attempted to employ.
The Plastico.Nov.02.2012
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Why Mitt Has To Pick Marco To Win In November
The Overwhelming Electoral College Case For Selecting Marco Rubio of Florida As VP
2012. The Plastico. All Rights Reserved.
Los Angeles, CA (The Plastico) - A few days ago President Obama made a seemingly bold statement on gay marriage - he supports it. Since then, it has become clear that the President's statement to ABC news was nothing more provocative or supportive than Dick Cheney's statement in 2004 that he too supports same sex marriage. In both cases, both men said they support it but that they also support a states right to ban it outright.
As the smoke cleared, a few things became obvious. Obama had now 'boldly' evolved into Dick Cheney of 2004 (regarding gay marriage), and an electoral shift (temporary or not) was unfolding.
North Carolina, a huge investment for Obama in 2012, may be off the table for Democrats after a decisive 20%+ victory for the gay marriage ban. Those fifteen electoral votes (won by just 14,000) votes in '08 should be Mitt Romney's to lose.
So how does Marco Rubio fit in?
Romney already had to win Florida and Ohio to have any legitimate chance at the White house. Because of that necessity it almost appeared crucial that he win Florida without selecting Rubio. Romney needed to flip other states where he was even further behind Obama. Those states were Virginia (McDonald), Minnesota (Pawlenty), Wisconsin (Ryan) , Colorado (?), Nevada (Sandoval), New Mexico (Martinez) or maybe even New Jersey (Christie) or Pennsylvania (Santorum??? No).
Keep in mind that Romney geographically swings almost no states with his own nomadic past. He's lived in Michigan, Massachusetts, and California and has shown no sign of flipping those Democratic strongholds in '12. However, he likely will swing New Hampshire's 4 electoral votes and he might just need 5 of them.
This is where Rubio comes into play. Obama's gay marriage statement may slip under the rug and it may not. If it doesn't, it hurts Obama with older voters and white working class churchgoers in swing states like Ohio, North Carolina, Missouri, and possibly Minnesota or Wisconsin.
This leaves Obama changing focus to protect his electoral lead by clinging to a flimsy safety net called Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico to replace North Carolina's 15 electoral votes. Obama won these 3 states in 08' and he may need them all for re-election. Marco Rubio may be Romney's only chance to get younger and darker out west while still getting the closest thing Republicans have to a superstar.
Sound racist or ageist to anyone? Indeed, that is the game of electoral votes and Romney needs to cut down Obama's advantage among younger voters and Latino's in the West.
To do this Romney needs to jump on a strategy to put 4 states in play and to strengthen a tiny lead in Arizona. Those four are New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, and Oregon... yes Oregon. Oregon has been a closely contended state the past several elections despite literally no effort being made by the GOP. A recent Survey USA poll had Obama ahead in Oregon by just 4% - right at the margin of error. Certainly, Romney could at least force Obama to spend some unexpected money there.
Keep in mind that Romney has to win Florida and Ohio where he is currently slightly behind but in the margin of error. If Romney was able flip both North Carolina and Virginia back to the GOP he would have a much easier time. But Virginia will be hard to win back; Obama literally has poured many millions in federal stimulus directly into the pockets of Federal employees living in Northern Virginia.
So what if Romney takes North Carolina and Obama holds Virginia? The Plastico Electoral College Team finds the most likely scenario to be a fight out west. A fight that may well end in a National 269-269 tie. So How important does that New Mexico and Colorado vote look now?
So don't be surprised if Marco Rubio is announced before the end of May. But don't expect Rubio to hang out around Florida. You can look for the younger, darker half of the ticket to be arriving at an airport out west to collect some California cash and some potential western votes on the Colorado/New Mexico border.
2012. The Plastico. All Rights Reserved.
Monday, May 7, 2012
2012 Fortune 500 Full List. The Only Full List On One Page Anywhere On The Web!!
| Rank ▾ | Company | Revenues ($ millions) |
Profits ($ millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exxon Mobil | 452,926.0 | 41,060.0 |
| 2 | Wal-Mart Stores | 446,950.0 | 15,699.0 |
| 3 | Chevron | 245,621.0 | 26,895.0 |
| 4 | ConocoPhillips | 237,272.0 | 12,436.0 |
| 5 | General Motors | 150,276.0 | 9,190.0 |
| 6 | General Electric | 147,616.0 | 14,151.0 |
| 7 | Berkshire Hathaway | 143,688.0 | 10,254.0 |
| 8 | Fannie Mae | 137,451.0 | -16,855.0 |
| 9 | Ford Motor | 136,264.0 | 20,213.0 |
| 10 | Hewlett-Packard | 127,245.0 | 7,074.0 |
| 11 | AT&T | 126,723.0 | 3,944.0 |
| 12 | Valero Energy | 125,095.0 | 2,090.0 |
| 13 | Bank of America Corp. | 115,074.0 | 1,446.0 |
| 14 | McKesson | 112,084.0 | 1,202.0 |
| 15 | Verizon Communications | 110,875.0 | 2,404.0 |
| 16 | J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. | 110,838.0 | 18,976.0 |
| 17 | Apple | 108,249.0 | 25,922.0 |
| 18 | CVS Caremark | 107,750.0 | 3,461.0 |
| 19 | International Business Machines | 106,916.0 | 15,855.0 |
| 20 | Citigroup | 102,939.0 | 11,067.0 |
| 21 | Cardinal Health | 102,644.2 | 959.0 |
| 22 | UnitedHealth Group | 101,862.0 | 5,142.0 |
| 23 | Kroger | 90,374.0 | 602.0 |
| 24 | Costco Wholesale | 88,915.0 | 1,462.0 |
| 25 | Freddie Mac | 88,262.0 | -5,266.0 |
| 26 | Wells Fargo | 87,597.0 | 15,869.0 |
| 27 | Procter & Gamble | 82,559.0 | 11,797.0 |
| 28 | Archer Daniels Midland | 80,676.0 | 2,036.0 |
| 29 | AmerisourceBergen | 80,217.6 | 706.6 |
| 30 | INTL FCStone | 75,497.6 | 37.3 |
| 31 | Marathon Petroleum | 73,645.0 | 2,389.0 |
| 32 | Walgreen | 72,184.0 | 2,714.0 |
| 33 | American International Group | 71,730.0 | 17,798.0 |
| 34 | MetLife | 70,641.0 | 6,981.0 |
| 35 | Home Depot | 70,395.0 | 3,883.0 |
| 36 | Medco Health Solutions | 70,063.3 | 1,455.7 |
| 37 | Microsoft | 69,943.0 | 23,150.0 |
| 38 | Target | 69,865.0 | 2,929.0 |
| 39 | Boeing | 68,735.0 | 4,018.0 |
| 40 | Pfizer | 67,932.0 | 10,009.0 |
| 41 | PepsiCo | 66,504.0 | 6,443.0 |
| 42 | Johnson & Johnson | 65,030.0 | 9,672.0 |
| 43 | State Farm Insurance Cos. | 64,305.1 | 845.0 |
| 44 | Dell | 62,071.0 | 3,492.0 |
| 45 | WellPoint | 60,710.7 | 2,646.7 |
| 46 | Caterpillar | 60,138.0 | 4,928.0 |
| 47 | Dow Chemical | 59,985.0 | 2,742.0 |
| 48 | United Technologies | 58,190.0 | 4,979.0 |
| 49 | Comcast | 55,842.0 | 4,160.0 |
| 50 | Kraft Foods | 54,365.0 | 3,527.0 |
| 51 | Intel | 53,999.0 | 12,942.0 |
| 52 | United Parcel Service | 53,105.0 | 3,804.0 |
| 53 | Best Buy | 50,272.0 | 1,277.0 |
| 54 | Lowe's | 50,208.0 | 1,839.0 |
| 55 | Prudential Financial | 49,045.0 | 3,666.0 |
| 56 | Amazon.com | 48,077.0 | 631.0 |
| 57 | Merck | 48,047.0 | 6,272.0 |
| 58 | Lockheed Martin | 46,692.0 | 2,655.0 |
| 59 | Coca-Cola | 46,542.0 | 8,572.0 |
| 60 | Express Scripts Holding | 46,128.3 | 1,275.8 |
| 61 | Sunoco | 45,765.0 | -1,684.0 |
| 62 | Enterprise Products Partners | 44,313.0 | 2,046.9 |
| 63 | Safeway | 43,630.2 | 516.7 |
| 64 | Cisco Systems | 43,218.0 | 6,490.0 |
| 65 | Sears Holdings | 41,567.0 | -3,140.0 |
| 66 | Walt Disney | 40,893.0 | 4,807.0 |
| 67 | Johnson Controls | 40,833.0 | 1,624.0 |
| 68 | Morgan Stanley | 39,376.0 | 4,110.0 |
| 69 | Sysco | 39,323.5 | 1,152.0 |
| 70 | FedEx | 39,304.0 | 1,452.0 |
| 71 | Abbott Laboratories | 38,851.3 | 4,728.4 |
| 72 | DuPont | 38,719.0 | 3,474.0 |
| 73 | 37,905.0 | 9,737.0 | |
| 74 | Hess | 37,871.0 | 1,703.0 |
| 75 | Supervalu | 37,534.0 | -1,510.0 |
| 76 | United Continental Holdings | 37,110.0 | 840.0 |
| 77 | Honeywell International | 37,059.0 | 2,067.0 |
| 78 | CHS | 36,915.8 | 961.4 |
| 79 | Humana | 36,832.0 | 1,419.0 |
| 80 | Goldman Sachs Group | 36,793.0 | 4,442.0 |
| 81 | Ingram Micro | 36,328.7 | 244.2 |
| 82 | Oracle | 35,622.0 | 8,547.0 |
| 83 | Delta Air Lines | 35,115.0 | 854.0 |
| 84 | Liberty Mutual Insurance Group | 34,671.0 | 365.0 |
| 85 | World Fuel Services | 34,622.9 | 194.0 |
| 86 | New York Life Insurance | 34,393.5 | 557.3 |
| 87 | Plains All American Pipeline | 34,275.0 | 966.0 |
| 88 | TIAA-CREF | 34,079.0 | 2,388.4 |
| 89 | Aetna | 33,779.8 | 1,985.7 |
| 90 | Sprint Nextel | 33,679.0 | -2,890.0 |
| 91 | News Corp. | 33,405.0 | 2,739.0 |
| 92 | General Dynamics | 32,677.0 | 2,526.0 |
| 93 | Allstate | 32,654.0 | 788.0 |
| 94 | HCA Holdings | 32,506.0 | 2,465.0 |
| 95 | American Express | 32,282.0 | 4,935.0 |
| 96 | Tyson Foods | 32,266.0 | 750.0 |
| 97 | Deere | 32,012.5 | 2,799.9 |
| 98 | Murphy Oil | 31,446.3 | 872.7 |
| 99 | Philip Morris International | 31,097.0 | 8,591.0 |
| 100 | Nationwide | 30,697.8 | -793.1 |
| Rank ▾ | Company | Revenues ($ millions) |
Profits ($ millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Tesoro | 29,927.0 | 546.0 |
| 102 | 3M | 29,611.0 | 4,283.0 |
| 103 | Time Warner | 28,974.0 | 2,886.0 |
| 104 | Northrop Grumman | 28,058.0 | 2,118.0 |
| 105 | DirecTV | 27,226.0 | 2,609.0 |
| 106 | Publix Super Markets | 27,178.8 | 1,492.0 |
| 107 | McDonald's | 27,006.0 | 5,503.1 |
| 108 | Avnet | 26,534.4 | 669.1 |
| 109 | Tech Data | 26,488.1 | 206.4 |
| 110 | Macy's | 26,405.0 | 1,256.0 |
| 111 | International Paper | 26,034.0 | 1,341.0 |
| 112 | Travelers Cos. | 25,446.0 | 1,426.0 |
| 113 | Rite Aid | 25,214.9 | -555.4 |
| 114 | Staples | 25,022.2 | 984.7 |
| 115 | Alcoa | 24,951.0 | 611.0 |
| 116 | Northwestern Mutual | 24,861.0 | 645.1 |
| 117 | Raytheon | 24,857.0 | 1,866.0 |
| 118 | Halliburton | 24,829.0 | 2,839.0 |
| 119 | Eli Lilly | 24,286.5 | 4,347.7 |
| 120 | Emerson Electric | 24,234.0 | 2,480.0 |
| 121 | Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance | 24,226.4 | 877.4 |
| 122 | Occidental Petroleum | 24,216.0 | 6,771.0 |
| 123 | AMR | 23,979.0 | -1,979.0 |
| 124 | Fluor | 23,381.4 | 593.7 |
| 125 | TJX | 23,191.5 | 1,496.1 |
| 126 | Goodyear Tire & Rubber | 22,767.0 | 343.0 |
| 127 | Xerox | 22,626.0 | 1,295.0 |
| 128 | Aflac | 22,171.0 | 1,964.0 |
| 129 | Manpower | 22,006.0 | 251.6 |
| 130 | Cigna | 21,998.0 | 1,327.0 |
| 131 | Hartford Financial Services Group | 21,918.0 | 662.0 |
| 132 | U.S. Bancorp | 21,399.0 | 4,872.0 |
| 133 | Arrow Electronics | 21,390.3 | 598.8 |
| 134 | Bristol-Myers Squibb | 21,244.0 | 3,709.0 |
| 135 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold | 20,880.0 | 4,560.0 |
| 136 | Nike | 20,862.0 | 2,133.0 |
| 137 | Kimberly-Clark | 20,846.0 | 1,591.0 |
| 138 | Nucor | 20,023.6 | 778.2 |
| 139 | EMC | 20,007.6 | 2,461.3 |
| 140 | United States Steel | 19,884.0 | -53.0 |
| 141 | Baker Hughes | 19,831.0 | 1,739.0 |
| 142 | Time Warner Cable | 19,675.0 | 1,665.0 |
| 143 | Union Pacific | 19,557.0 | 3,292.0 |
| 144 | United Services Automobile Assn. | 19,036.1 | 2,128.3 |
| 145 | Exelon | 18,924.0 | 2,495.0 |
| 146 | Kohl's | 18,804.0 | 1,167.0 |
| 147 | Whirlpool | 18,666.0 | 390.0 |
| 148 | Capital One Financial | 18,525.0 | 3,147.0 |
| 149 | Illinois Tool Works | 18,256.8 | 2,071.4 |
| 150 | Cummins | 18,048.0 | 1,848.0 |
| 151 | AES | 17,759.0 | 58.0 |
| 152 | Southern | 17,657.0 | 2,203.0 |
| 153 | J.C. Penney | 17,260.0 | -152.0 |
| 154 | Apache | 16,888.0 | 4,584.0 |
| 155 | Colgate-Palmolive | 16,734.0 | 2,431.0 |
| 156 | Altria Group | 16,619.0 | 3,390.0 |
| 157 | Jabil Circuit | 16,518.8 | 381.1 |
| 158 | Danaher | 16,476.4 | 2,172.3 |
| 159 | Paccar | 16,355.2 | 1,042.3 |
| 160 | FirstEnergy | 16,258.0 | 885.0 |
| 161 | TRW Automotive Holdings | 16,244.0 | 1,157.0 |
| 162 | Computer Sciences | 16,144.0 | 740.0 |
| 163 | Eaton | 16,049.0 | 1,350.0 |
| 164 | Medtronic | 15,933.0 | 3,096.0 |
| 165 | PNC Financial Services Group | 15,820.0 | 3,056.0 |
| 166 | Bank of New York Mellon Corp. | 15,804.0 | 2,516.0 |
| 167 | Southwest Airlines | 15,658.0 | 178.0 |
| 168 | Amgen | 15,582.0 | 3,683.0 |
| 169 | Progressive | 15,508.1 | 1,015.5 |
| 170 | HollyFrontier | 15,439.5 | 1,023.4 |
| 171 | CenturyLink | 15,351.0 | 573.0 |
| 172 | NextEra Energy | 15,341.0 | 1,923.0 |
| 173 | Marathon Oil | 15,282.0 | 2,946.0 |
| 174 | L-3 Communications | 15,169.0 | 956.0 |
| 175 | Oneok | 15,119.2 | 360.6 |
| 176 | American Electric Power | 15,116.0 | 1,941.0 |
| 177 | Viacom | 14,963.0 | 2,136.0 |
| 178 | Qualcomm | 14,962.0 | 4,260.0 |
| 179 | PG&E Corp. | 14,956.0 | 844.0 |
| 180 | PPG Industries | 14,885.0 | 1,095.0 |
| 181 | General Mills | 14,880.2 | 1,798.3 |
| 182 | Global Partners | 14,835.7 | 19.4 |
| 183 | Dollar General | 14,807.2 | 766.7 |
| 184 | National Oilwell Varco | 14,658.0 | 1,994.0 |
| 185 | Gap | 14,549.0 | 833.0 |
| 186 | Duke Energy | 14,529.0 | 1,706.0 |
| 187 | Dominion Resources | 14,379.0 | 1,408.0 |
| 188 | CBS | 14,245.0 | 1,305.0 |
| 189 | Lear | 14,156.5 | 540.7 |
| 190 | Loews | 14,127.0 | 1,064.0 |
| 191 | DISH Network | 14,048.4 | 1,515.9 |
| 192 | Anadarko Petroleum | 13,967.0 | -2,649.0 |
| 193 | Navistar International | 13,958.0 | 1,723.0 |
| 194 | Toys "R" Us | 13,909.0 | 149.0 |
| 195 | Baxter International | 13,893.0 | 2,224.0 |
| 196 | Omnicom Group | 13,872.5 | 952.6 |
| 197 | AutoNation | 13,832.4 | 281.4 |
| 198 | Community Health Systems | 13,817.0 | 201.9 |
| 199 | Constellation Energy | 13,758.2 | -340.3 |
| 200 | Texas Instruments | 13,735.0 | 2,236.0 |
| Rank ▾ | Company | Revenues ($ millions) |
Profits ($ millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | Ally Financial | 13,642.0 | -157.0 |
| 202 | Chubb | 13,585.0 | 1,678.0 |
| 203 | Waste Management | 13,378.0 | 961.0 |
| 204 | Aramark | 13,244.7 | 100.1 |
| 205 | Kellogg | 13,198.0 | 1,231.0 |
| 206 | Motorola Mobility Holdings | 13,064.0 | -249.0 |
| 207 | Dean Foods | 13,055.5 | -1,575.6 |
| 208 | US Airways Group | 13,055.0 | 71.0 |
| 209 | Consolidated Edison | 12,938.0 | 1,051.0 |
| 210 | Land O'Lakes | 12,849.3 | 182.2 |
| 211 | Edison International | 12,760.0 | -37.0 |
| 212 | PPL | 12,756.0 | 1,495.0 |
| 213 | Yum Brands | 12,626.0 | 1,319.0 |
| 214 | Genuine Parts | 12,458.9 | 565.1 |
| 215 | ConAgra Foods | 12,395.5 | 817.0 |
| 216 | Parker Hannifin | 12,345.9 | 1,049.1 |
| 217 | Marriott International | 12,317.0 | 198.0 |
| 218 | Smithfield Foods | 12,202.7 | 521.0 |
| 219 | Coventry Health Care | 12,186.7 | 543.1 |
| 220 | Sara Lee | 12,103.0 | 1,287.0 |
| 221 | Health Net | 11,901.0 | 72.1 |
| 222 | Penske Automotive Group | 11,869.5 | 176.9 |
| 223 | Icahn Enterprises | 11,855.0 | 750.0 |
| 224 | Monsanto | 11,822.0 | 1,607.0 |
| 225 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 11,780.2 | 1,329.9 |
| 226 | CSX | 11,743.0 | 1,822.0 |
| 227 | Starbucks | 11,700.4 | 1,245.7 |
| 228 | eBay | 11,651.7 | 3,229.4 |
| 229 | Chesapeake Energy | 11,635.0 | 1,742.0 |
| 230 | Liberty Interactive | 11,624.0 | 912.0 |
| 231 | Marsh & McLennan | 11,526.0 | 993.0 |
| 232 | Devon Energy | 11,497.0 | 4,704.0 |
| 233 | Office Depot | 11,489.5 | 95.7 |
| 234 | Avon Products | 11,291.6 | 513.6 |
| 235 | Aon | 11,287.0 | 979.0 |
| 236 | Textron | 11,275.0 | 242.0 |
| 237 | Huntsman | 11,259.0 | 247.0 |
| 238 | Praxair | 11,252.0 | 1,672.0 |
| 239 | Entergy | 11,229.1 | 1,346.4 |
| 240 | Public Service Enterprise Group | 11,191.0 | 1,503.0 |
| 241 | Norfolk Southern | 11,172.0 | 1,916.0 |
| 242 | Nordstrom | 10,877.0 | 683.0 |
| 243 | First Data | 10,713.6 | -516.1 |
| 244 | H.J. Heinz | 10,706.6 | 989.5 |
| 245 | SAIC | 10,657.0 | 59.0 |
| 246 | Xcel Energy | 10,654.8 | 841.2 |
| 247 | Lincoln National | 10,635.6 | 293.8 |
| 248 | Ameriprise Financial | 10,621.0 | 1,076.0 |
| 249 | R.R. Donnelley & Sons | 10,611.0 | -122.6 |
| 250 | Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America | 10,571.3 | 209.9 |
| 251 | Applied Materials | 10,517.0 | 1,926.0 |
| 252 | Stanley Black & Decker | 10,437.6 | 674.6 |
| 253 | Synnex | 10,409.8 | 150.3 |
| 254 | Jacobs Engineering Group | 10,381.7 | 331.0 |
| 255 | Peter Kiewit Sons' | 10,381.0 | 573.0 |
| 256 | Limited Brands | 10,364.0 | 850.1 |
| 257 | Newmont Mining | 10,358.0 | 366.0 |
| 258 | Genworth Financial | 10,344.0 | 122.0 |
| 259 | C.H. Robinson Worldwide | 10,336.3 | 431.6 |
| 260 | Unum Group | 10,278.0 | 235.4 |
| 261 | Liberty Global | 10,246.5 | -772.7 |
| 262 | State Street Corp. | 10,207.0 | 1,920.0 |
| 263 | EOG Resources | 10,126.1 | 1,091.1 |
| 264 | Whole Foods Market | 10,107.8 | 342.6 |
| 265 | Air Products & Chemicals | 10,082.0 | 1,224.2 |
| 266 | Sempra Energy | 10,036.0 | 1,357.0 |
| 267 | BB&T Corp. | 9,998.0 | 1,289.0 |
| 268 | Mosaic | 9,937.8 | 2,514.6 |
| 269 | Automatic Data Processing | 9,879.5 | 1,254.2 |
| 270 | CDW | 9,602.4 | 17.1 |
| 271 | SunTrust Banks | 9,602.0 | 647.0 |
| 272 | Tenet Healthcare | 9,601.0 | 82.0 |
| 273 | GameStop | 9,550.5 | 339.9 |
| 274 | Motorola Solutions | 9,549.0 | 1,158.0 |
| 275 | URS | 9,545.0 | -465.8 |
| 276 | Western Digital | 9,526.0 | 726.0 |
| 277 | VF | 9,459.2 | 888.1 |
| 278 | Las Vegas Sands | 9,410.7 | 1,560.1 |
| 279 | CarMax | 9,402.2 | 380.9 |
| 280 | KBR | 9,261.0 | 480.0 |
| 281 | Visa | 9,188.0 | 3,650.0 |
| 282 | Enbridge Energy Partners | 9,109.8 | 624.0 |
| 283 | BlackRock | 9,081.0 | 2,337.0 |
| 284 | NRG Energy | 9,079.0 | 197.0 |
| 285 | Western Refining | 9,071.0 | 132.7 |
| 286 | Progress Energy | 8,907.0 | 575.0 |
| 287 | DTE Energy | 8,897.0 | 711.0 |
| 288 | Caesars Entertainment | 8,834.5 | -687.6 |
| 289 | Reinsurance Group of America | 8,829.5 | 599.6 |
| 290 | Estée Lauder | 8,810.0 | 700.8 |
| 291 | Micron Technology | 8,788.0 | 167.0 |
| 292 | AGCO | 8,773.2 | 583.3 |
| 293 | Sherwin-Williams | 8,765.7 | 441.9 |
| 294 | Bed Bath & Beyond | 8,758.5 | 791.3 |
| 295 | Principal Financial | 8,709.6 | 715.0 |
| 296 | Crown Holdings | 8,644.0 | 282.0 |
| 297 | Ball | 8,630.9 | 444.0 |
| 298 | Owens & Minor | 8,627.9 | 115.2 |
| 299 | Ross Stores | 8,608.3 | 657.2 |
| 300 | Discover Financial Services | 8,550.3 | 2,226.7 |
| Rank ▾ | Company | Revenues ($ millions) |
Profits ($ millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 301 | Family Dollar Stores | 8,547.8 | 388.4 |
| 302 | Reynolds American | 8,541.0 | 1,406.0 |
| 303 | Henry Schein | 8,530.2 | 367.7 |
| 304 | Dover | 8,501.9 | 895.2 |
| 305 | CenterPoint Energy | 8,450.0 | 1,357.0 |
| 306 | Gilead Sciences | 8,385.4 | 2,803.6 |
| 307 | Ashland | 8,370.0 | 414.0 |
| 308 | Stryker | 8,307.0 | 1,345.0 |
| 309 | Hertz Global Holdings | 8,298.4 | 176.2 |
| 310 | Assurant | 8,272.8 | 545.8 |
| 311 | Kinder Morgan | 8,264.9 | 594.4 |
| 312 | Energy Transfer Equity | 8,240.7 | 309.8 |
| 313 | Autoliv | 8,232.4 | 623.4 |
| 314 | Republic Services | 8,192.9 | 589.2 |
| 315 | Reliance Steel & Aluminum | 8,134.7 | 343.8 |
| 316 | Peabody Energy | 8,096.0 | 957.7 |
| 317 | Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea | 8,078.5 | -598.6 |
| 318 | W.W. Grainger | 8,078.2 | 658.4 |
| 319 | Goodrich | 8,074.9 | 810.4 |
| 320 | AutoZone | 8,073.0 | 849.0 |
| 321 | Visteon | 8,047.0 | 80.0 |
| 322 | AECOM Technology | 8,037.4 | 275.8 |
| 323 | Steel Dynamics | 7,997.5 | 278.1 |
| 324 | Coca-Cola Enterprises | 7,939.0 | 749.0 |
| 325 | Williams | 7,930.0 | 376.0 |
| 326 | Commercial Metals | 7,919.8 | -129.6 |
| 327 | Hormel Foods | 7,895.1 | 474.2 |
| 328 | Corning | 7,890.0 | 2,805.0 |
| 329 | TravelCenters of America | 7,888.9 | 23.6 |
| 330 | Sonic Automotive | 7,871.3 | 76.3 |
| 331 | MGM Resorts International | 7,849.3 | 3,114.6 |
| 332 | Thrivent Financial for Lutherans | 7,842.8 | 454.6 |
| 333 | Becton Dickinson | 7,832.1 | 1,271.0 |
| 334 | Campbell Soup | 7,719.0 | 805.0 |
| 335 | Boston Scientific | 7,622.0 | 441.0 |
| 336 | Dana Holding | 7,592.0 | 219.0 |
| 337 | Oshkosh | 7,584.7 | 273.4 |
| 338 | Masco | 7,560.0 | -575.0 |
| 339 | Universal Health Services | 7,534.1 | 398.2 |
| 340 | Ameren | 7,531.0 | 519.0 |
| 341 | Quest Diagnostics | 7,510.5 | 470.6 |
| 342 | Darden Restaurants | 7,500.2 | 476.3 |
| 343 | Regions Financial | 7,427.0 | -215.0 |
| 344 | Broadcom | 7,389.0 | 927.0 |
| 345 | Owens-Illinois | 7,358.0 | -510.0 |
| 346 | Eastman Chemical | 7,283.0 | 696.0 |
| 347 | Pantry | 7,271.8 | 9.8 |
| 348 | Cablevision Systems | 7,252.3 | 291.9 |
| 349 | Dole Food | 7,223.8 | 38.4 |
| 350 | Tenneco | 7,205.0 | 157.0 |
| 351 | Charter Communications | 7,204.0 | -369.0 |
| 352 | Spectrum Group International | 7,203.4 | 3.8 |
| 353 | Franklin Resources | 7,140.0 | 1,923.6 |
| 354 | OfficeMax | 7,121.2 | 34.9 |
| 355 | BorgWarner | 7,114.7 | 550.1 |
| 356 | Alpha Natural Resources | 7,109.2 | -677.4 |
| 357 | Energy Future Holdings | 7,040.0 | -1,913.0 |
| 358 | Interpublic Group | 7,014.6 | 532.3 |
| 359 | DaVita | 6,998.9 | 478.0 |
| 360 | Barnes & Noble | 6,998.6 | -73.9 |
| 361 | Targa Resources | 6,994.5 | 30.7 |
| 362 | Cameron International | 6,959.0 | 521.9 |
| 363 | Winn-Dixie Stores | 6,929.9 | -70.1 |
| 364 | Calpine | 6,800.0 | -190.0 |
| 365 | Ecolab | 6,798.5 | 462.5 |
| 366 | Cliffs Natural Resources | 6,794.3 | 1,619.1 |
| 367 | Avery Dennison | 6,786.7 | 190.1 |
| 368 | Celanese | 6,763.0 | 607.0 |
| 369 | NII Holdings | 6,719.3 | 198.8 |
| 370 | MasterCard | 6,714.0 | 1,906.0 |
| 371 | Jarden | 6,679.9 | 204.7 |
| 372 | Fifth Third Bancorp | 6,673.0 | 1,297.0 |
| 373 | Dollar Tree | 6,630.5 | 488.3 |
| 374 | Weyerhaeuser | 6,618.0 | 331.0 |
| 375 | Agilent Technologies | 6,615.0 | 1,012.0 |
| 376 | Sanmina-SCI | 6,602.4 | 68.9 |
| 377 | NuStar Energy | 6,575.3 | 221.5 |
| 378 | Advanced Micro Devices | 6,568.0 | 491.0 |
| 379 | Terex | 6,504.6 | 45.2 |
| 380 | CMS Energy | 6,503.0 | 415.0 |
| 381 | AK Steel Holding | 6,468.0 | -155.6 |
| 382 | American Family Insurance Group | 6,400.2 | 295.2 |
| 383 | Dillard's | 6,399.8 | 463.9 |
| 384 | McGraw-Hill | 6,336.0 | 911.0 |
| 385 | Amerigroup | 6,318.4 | 195.6 |
| 386 | Anixter International | 6,270.1 | 188.2 |
| 387 | Precision Castparts | 6,267.2 | 1,013.5 |
| 388 | Mattel | 6,266.0 | 768.5 |
| 389 | Omnicare | 6,239.9 | 86.9 |
| 390 | Corn Products International | 6,219.4 | 415.7 |
| 391 | Symantec | 6,190.0 | 597.0 |
| 392 | Advance Auto Parts | 6,170.5 | 394.7 |
| 393 | Core-Mark Holding | 6,163.4 | 26.2 |
| 394 | CC Media Holdings | 6,161.4 | -302.1 |
| 395 | Expeditors International of Washington | 6,150.5 | 385.7 |
| 396 | Mylan | 6,129.8 | 536.8 |
| 397 | Wesco International | 6,125.7 | 196.3 |
| 398 | Cognizant Technology Solutions | 6,121.2 | 883.6 |
| 399 | Consol Energy | 6,117.2 | 632.5 |
| 400 | PetSmart | 6,113.3 | 290.2 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
